Last week, the European Commission decided not to renew the approval of the neonicotinoid active substance thiacloprid.
The insecticide, which is manufactured by Bayer, is used for aphid control on some field vegetable crops, as well as in orchards. The active is found in products such as Calypso and Biscaya, but overall sales volumes of these products in Ireland are low.
Dates for the final use of products containing the active were announced this week and are as follows:
Neonicotinoids, commonly referred to as neonics or NNIs are active substances used in plant protection products to control harmful insects. This group of actives has drawn much criticism over the past decade due to their endocrine disruption properties and the potential risk to bees.
Useful facts about neonicotinoids
Below are some useful facts about the actives:
A focus on bees
In 2013, five neonics insecticides were approved as active substances in the EU for the use in plant protection products, namely clothianidin, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, acetamiprid and thiacloprid.
As readers will know, the EU has one of the strictest regulatory systems in the world in relation to the approval of pesticides. All pesticides on the market must go through thorough assessment to ensure a high level of protection of both human and animal health and the environment.
By their very nature, insecticides are toxic to bees. However, the European Commission states that their use should still be possible if exposure does not occur or is minimised to levels which do not generate harmful effects.
Within the EU, regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 provides clear criteria for the approval of active substances, including criteria in relation to honey bees. It requires a fact-based approach and appropriate risk assessment of any active substance. They can be approved only if their use:
When this framework was adopted, the Commission laid down new "data requirements" for pesticide dossiers.
The dossiers for active substances and plant protection products have to comply with these minimum data requirements. This significantly strengthened the authorisation process for plant protection products, including several new requirements regarding bees.
Neonicotinoids under scrutiny in the EU
In 2012, new scientific findings indicated that some insecticides showed high risks for bees. These were Fipronil (this pesticide was reviewed by European Food Safety Authority and was subsequently subject to restrictions) and neonics.
As a result, in 2013, the Commission severely restricted the use of plant protection products and treated seeds containing three of these neonics (clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam) to protect honeybees. Clothianidin was a key ingredient in the seed dressing Redigo Deter.
This measure was based on the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) risk assessment in 2012. It prohibited the use of these three neonics in bee-attractive crops (including maize, oilseed rape and sunflower), with the exception of uses in greenhouses, of treatment of some crops after flowering and of winter cereals.
At the same time, the applicants of the three actives were obliged to provide further data (so-called "confirmatory information") for each actives in order to confirm the safety of the uses still allowed.
Following the assessment of this confirmatory information by EFSA of clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, the remaining outdoor uses could no longer be considered safe due to the identified risks to bees.
Outdoor ban
Therefore, in 2017 the Commission prepared proposals to completely ban the outdoor use of these three active substances.
In the meantime, the EFSA evaluated data collected in an open call for the review of the 2013 restrictions for the three neonics.
In actual fact, the deadline for this evaluation was postponed until February 2018 due to the amount of data to be assessed, the complexity of the request and to give member states' experts sufficient opportunity to comment on EFSA's draft conclusions.
The EFSA conclusions on the risk assessment for the three active substances concluded that they confirm the already identified risks for their outdoor use.
Therefore, the Commission maintained their proposals to completely ban the outdoor use of the three active substances and these were subsequently supported by a qualified majority of member states on 27 April 2018.
As a result, all outdoor use of the three substances are banned and only the use in permanent greenhouses remains possible.
Renewal of approval
In the light of these restrictions, the applicants for the renewal of approval of clothianidin and thiamethoxam withdrew their applications. The approval of these substances then expired on 31 January 2019 and 30 April 2019 respectively.
The deadline for submission of the renewal dossier for imidacloprid is 31 January 2020 and the expiry date for imidacloprid is 31 July 2022.
Not all bad news
The neonic acetamiprid was deemed by the EFSA to be a low risk to bees. The active is used mainly in household garden products.
A ban or further restrictions of this substance was deemed to be neither scientifically nor legally appropriate.
A draft regulation proposing a renewal of approval until February 2033 was presented to the member states in October 2017. The committee gave a favourable opinion on the draft regulation with a qualified majority of member states.
Fifth neonicotinoid gone
The fifth neonicotinoid registered in 2013, thiacloprid, was a candidate for substitution, based on its endocrine disrupting properties.
Candidates for substitution are pesticides for which national authorities need to carry out an assessment to establish whether more favourable alternatives to using the active exist, including non-chemical methods.
The approval for thiacloprid is due to expire on 30 April 2020. Based on the EFSA conclusion, which was published at the beginning of 2019, the commission had proposed to the member states in the regulatory committee not to renew the approval.
On 22 October, the committee gave to this proposal a favourable opinion with a qualified majority of member states. The commission adopted the regulation on 13 January 2020.
Emergency authorisation
Following the restrictions on the three neonics in 2013, several member states have repeatedly granted emergency authorisations for some of the restricted uses.
In particular, Romania, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Hungary, Finland, Latvia and Estonia applied for multiple derogations on major crops since the entry into force of the restrictions of use.
The Commission had been closely monitoring this issue and mandated the EFSA to examine the emergency authorisations granted in 2017 by the member states who repeatedly granted them before.
The EFSA assessed whether the repeated use of these emergency authorisations was justified because of a danger which could not be contained by any other reasonable means.
The EFSA found that for about one third of the products for which emergency authorisations were granted, alternatives would have been available.
The Commission requested the member states involved to commit not to repeat the granting of the emergency authorisations in question, which two of the four accepted.
In the light of the outcome of the assessment by EFSA and the reaction of the member states concerned, the Commission proposed decisions requiring Romania and Lithuania not to grant emergency authorisation for the uses of these neonicotinoids for future seasons to the member states in the regulatory committee.
The votes on the draft on 22 October 2019 resulted in no opinion, meaning that there was insufficient support from the member states for the adoption of the decisions.
Votes in the appeal committee on 25 November 2019 also resulted in no opinion. The Commission is currently reflecting on the next steps.
In June of 2019, the IFA lodged an application for emergency authorisation of Redigo Deter (containing clothianidin) seed dressing. The emergency authorisation was not granted.
Information obtained from the European Commission plant website.
When it comes to aphids, IPM has never been so important
Emergency authorisation request for Redigo Deter seed dressing rejected
Crop Protection: pest control – present and future challenges