Opinion: pointless to shift emissions to another part of the globe
Denis Naughten, former Minister for Communications, Climate Action and the Environment, reacts to the revelation that Brazil is planning to add 24m cattle to its national herd, while Ireland plans to cut its herd.
As Minister for Communications, Climate Action and the Environment from 2016 to 2018, I pointed out to my EU and Government colleagues that if we end up reducing dairy and beef production in Ireland, it will be replaced by agricultural production in South America.
ADVERTISEMENT
Beef production in the Amazon basin in Brazil results in approximately 35 times more carbon emissions going into our atmosphere per kilo than beef produced in the west of Ireland - and that’s before we transport it halfway around the world!
I accept that Irish agriculture can and must do more in terms of emissions. And there is a lot that can be done, including many low hanging measures. For example, an initiative I promoted as climate minister called Smart Farming can reduce emissions by approximately 10%, as well as saving farmers money.
Reality
The reality is, with better grass management alone, we could help address our air quality, ammonia, and nitrates problems, as well as reducing methane emissions and promoting greater soil carbon sequestration.
But it is pointless just shifting emissions to another part of the globe where the emissions per tonne of food produced are multiples of that emitted by domestic food production.
This principle is already accepted at EU level, where there is a provision called carbon leakage built into the industrial emissions trading systems, to ensure that we are addressing global rather than just EU emissions, but that same provision is not applied to agriculture.
As a result, all we are doing is offshoring emissions to another part of the world where it will cause far greater harm to our planet, which was clearly exposed on today’s Irish Farmers Journal front page.
All we are doing is offshoring emissions to another part of the world where it will cause far greater harm to our planet
This is a mathematical exercise that is failing to address the fundamental global problem of net emissions going into our atmosphere year-on-year. We all recall a similar mathematical exercise two decades ago with the US sub-prime mortgage market, which led to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and had global repercussions. On this occasion, the long-term repercussions could be far greater.
The most effective and transparent way to address this, not just in the case of food but for all products, is to calculate carbon at the point of consumption.
So, if someone say in the UK eats beef coming from the Amazon basin rather than from a local farm, then this should be part of the UK emissions calculation too. One such mechanism is a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM).
Price will trump climate
Unless we address the demand issue, then price will, in many instances, trump climate - replace will, in many instances, trump repair - and isn’t that what carbon taxes are supposed to be about?
I suspect that if such an approach were taken, then far less industrial manufacturing would be off-shored to coal-powered facilities abroad.
This is an issue that needs to be addressed at a European and a global level before it is too late for everybody.
Here is what I said in Dáil Éireann on this very issue in 2020:
This content is available to digital subscribers and loyalty code users only. Sign in to your account, use the code or subscribe to get unlimited access.
However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the headline, summary and link below:
Title: Opinion: pointless to shift emissions to another part of the globe
Denis Naughten, former Minister for Communications, Climate Action and the Environment, reacts to the revelation that Brazil is planning to add 24m cattle to its national herd, while Ireland plans to cut its herd.
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
CODE ACCEPTED
You have full access to the site until next Wednesday at 9pm.
As Minister for Communications, Climate Action and the Environment from 2016 to 2018, I pointed out to my EU and Government colleagues that if we end up reducing dairy and beef production in Ireland, it will be replaced by agricultural production in South America.
Beef production in the Amazon basin in Brazil results in approximately 35 times more carbon emissions going into our atmosphere per kilo than beef produced in the west of Ireland - and that’s before we transport it halfway around the world!
I accept that Irish agriculture can and must do more in terms of emissions. And there is a lot that can be done, including many low hanging measures. For example, an initiative I promoted as climate minister called Smart Farming can reduce emissions by approximately 10%, as well as saving farmers money.
Reality
The reality is, with better grass management alone, we could help address our air quality, ammonia, and nitrates problems, as well as reducing methane emissions and promoting greater soil carbon sequestration.
But it is pointless just shifting emissions to another part of the globe where the emissions per tonne of food produced are multiples of that emitted by domestic food production.
This principle is already accepted at EU level, where there is a provision called carbon leakage built into the industrial emissions trading systems, to ensure that we are addressing global rather than just EU emissions, but that same provision is not applied to agriculture.
As a result, all we are doing is offshoring emissions to another part of the world where it will cause far greater harm to our planet, which was clearly exposed on today’s Irish Farmers Journal front page.
All we are doing is offshoring emissions to another part of the world where it will cause far greater harm to our planet
This is a mathematical exercise that is failing to address the fundamental global problem of net emissions going into our atmosphere year-on-year. We all recall a similar mathematical exercise two decades ago with the US sub-prime mortgage market, which led to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and had global repercussions. On this occasion, the long-term repercussions could be far greater.
The most effective and transparent way to address this, not just in the case of food but for all products, is to calculate carbon at the point of consumption.
So, if someone say in the UK eats beef coming from the Amazon basin rather than from a local farm, then this should be part of the UK emissions calculation too. One such mechanism is a carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM).
Price will trump climate
Unless we address the demand issue, then price will, in many instances, trump climate - replace will, in many instances, trump repair - and isn’t that what carbon taxes are supposed to be about?
I suspect that if such an approach were taken, then far less industrial manufacturing would be off-shored to coal-powered facilities abroad.
This is an issue that needs to be addressed at a European and a global level before it is too late for everybody.
Here is what I said in Dáil Éireann on this very issue in 2020:
If you would like to speak to a member of our team, please call us on 01-4199525.
Link sent to your email address
We have sent an email to your address. Please click on the link in this email to reset your password. If you can't find it in your inbox, please check your spam folder. If you can't find the email, please call us on 01-4199525.
ENTER YOUR LOYALTY CODE:
The reader loyalty code gives you full access to the site from when you enter it until the following Wednesday at 9pm. Find your unique code on the back page of Irish Country Living every week.
SHARING OPTIONS